"Orphan" afterglows in the Universal Structured Jet Model for gamma-ray bursts
Elena M. Rossi (JILA), Rosalba Perna (JILA), Fr\'ed\'eric Daigne, (IAP)

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the expected detection rates of orphan afterglows in the universal structured jet model for gamma-ray bursts, highlighting the importance of survey sensitivity and coverage across different wavelengths.
Contribution
It introduces a model-based prediction of orphan afterglow rates under the structured jet hypothesis, contrasting with the traditional top-hat jet model, and assesses observational prospects.
Findings
Current radio and X-ray surveys are insufficient for detecting orphan afterglows due to low sensitivity.
Optical surveys lack sufficient sky coverage to detect orphan afterglows.
Future instruments like LSST and the Allen Telescope Array will improve detection prospects.
Abstract
The paucity of reliable achromatic breaks in Gamma-Ray Burst afterglow light curves motivates independent measurements of the jet aperture. Serendipitous searches of afterglows, especially at radio wavelengths, have long been the classic alternative. These survey data have been interpreted assuming a uniformly emitting jet with sharp edges (``top-hat'' jet), in which case the ratio of weakly relativistically beamed afterglows to GRBs scales with the jet solid angle. In this paper, we consider, instead, a very wide outflow with a luminosity that decreases across the emitting surface. In particular, we adopt the universal structured jet (USJ) model, that is an alternative to the top-hat model for the structure of the jet. However, the interpretation of the survey data is very different: in the USJ model we only observe the emission within the jet aperture and the observed ratio of prompt…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
