Hidden-variable theory versus Copenhagen quantum mechanics
Milos V. Lokajicek

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the assumptions underlying Copenhagen quantum mechanics, argues for a hidden-variable interpretation based solely on the Schrödinger equation, and challenges the experimental support for the Copenhagen model.
Contribution
It proposes that the hidden-variable theory, based only on the Schrödinger equation without additional assumptions, better explains microscopic phenomena than Copenhagen quantum mechanics.
Findings
Experimental results support the hidden-variable interpretation over Copenhagen.
Most experiments only test the Schrödinger equation, not the full Copenhagen assumptions.
The hidden-variable theory removes the interpretational gap between microscopic and macroscopic worlds.
Abstract
The main assumptions the Copenhagen quantum mechanics has been based on will be summarized and the known (not yet decided) contradiction between Einstein and Bohr will be newly analyzed. The given assumptions have been represented basically by time-dependent Schroedinger equation, to which some further assumptions have been added. Some critical comments have been raised against the given mathematical model structure by Pauli (1933) and by Susskind and Glogover (1964). They may be removed if only the Schroedinger equation is conserved and the additional assumptions are abandoned, as shown recently. It seems to be in contradiction to the numerous declarations that the Copenhagen model has been approved by experimental results. However, in the most of these experiments only the agreement with the mere Schroedinger equation has been tested. All mentioned assumptions have been tested…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
