Dynamical Zodiacal Cloud Models Constrained by High Resolution Spectroscopy of the Zodiacal Light (Icarus, in press)
Sergei I. Ipatov, Alexander S. Kutyrev, Greg J. Madsen, John C., Mather, S. Harvey Moseley, Ronald J. Reynolds

TL;DR
This study models the Doppler shifts of zodiacal light caused by different dust sources and compares them with observations, revealing a significant contribution from cometary dust and estimating the dust composition and particle eccentricities.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of simulated Doppler shifts with high-resolution spectroscopic data to constrain the sources and properties of zodiacal dust.
Findings
Cometary dust significantly contributes to zodiacal light.
Approximately one-third of zodiacal dust originates from cometary particles.
Mean eccentricities of dust particles are estimated between 0.2 and 0.5.
Abstract
The simulated Doppler shifts of the solar Mg I Fraunhofer line produced by scattering on the solar light by asteroidal, cometary, and trans-Neptunian dust particles are compared with the shifts obtained by Wisconsin H-Alpha Mapper (WHAM) spectrometer. The simulated spectra are based on the results of integrations of the orbital evolution of particles. The deviation of the derived spectral parameters for various sources of dust used in the model reached maximum at the elongation (measured eastward from the Sun) between 90 deg and 120 deg. For the future zodiacal light Doppler shifts measurements, it is important to pay a particular attention to observing at this elongation range. At the elongations of the fields observed by WHAM, the model-predicted Doppler shifts were close to each other for several scattering functions considered. Therefore the main conclusions of our paper don't…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
