How strong is the evidence for accelerated expansion?
Marina Seikel, Dominik J. Schwarz

TL;DR
This paper assesses the evidence for the universe's accelerated expansion using supernova data without assuming specific matter-energy models, highlighting the influence of data choices and systematic errors on the results.
Contribution
It provides a model-independent test of cosmic acceleration, emphasizing the dependence of results on data set, fitting method, and calibration, and reports significant evidence for acceleration in flat universe models.
Findings
Strong 5 sigma evidence for acceleration in flat universe
Reduced 1.8 sigma evidence in open universe
Results highly sensitive to data and calibration choices
Abstract
We test the present expansion of the universe using supernova type Ia data without making any assumptions about the matter and energy content of the universe or about the parameterization of the deceleration parameter. We assume the cosmological principle to apply in a strict sense. The result strongly depends on the data set, the light-curve fitting method and the calibration of the absolute magnitude used for the test, indicating strong systematic errors. Nevertheless, in a spatially flat universe there is at least a 5 sigma evidence for acceleration which drops to 1.8 sigma in an open universe.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
