There is no axiomatic system for the quantum theory
Koji Nagata

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the Hilbert space formalism of quantum theory cannot be fully axiomatized, as the probability theory of measurement outcomes conflicts with the existence of the Bloch sphere in spin-1/2 systems.
Contribution
It derives a new inequality testing the Bloch sphere's existence, revealing fundamental contradictions in the axiomatic foundations of quantum theory.
Findings
The inequality is violated by quantum measurement probabilities.
The Bloch sphere cannot be consistently incorporated into the formalism.
A contradiction exists in the axiomatic structure of quantum mechanics.
Abstract
Recently, [arXiv:0810.3134] is accepted and published. We derive an inequality with two settings as tests for the existence of the Bloch sphere in a spin-1/2 system. The probability theory of measurement outcome within the formalism of von Neumann projective measurement violates the inequality. Namely, we have to give up the existence of the Bloch sphere. Or, we have to give up the probability theory of measurement outcome within the formalism of von Neumann projective measurement. Hence it turns out that there is a contradiction in the Hilbert space formalism of the quantum theory, viz., there is no axiomatic system for the theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science · Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis
