Frisch, Muller and Belot on an Inconsistency in Classical Electrodynamics
Peter Vickers

TL;DR
This paper examines the debate over the consistency of classical electrodynamics and proposes that clarifying the meaning of 'theory' can resolve disagreements.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to managing inconsistencies in classical electrodynamics by disambiguating the concept of 'theory'.
Findings
Disagreements stem from different interpretations of 'theory'.
Disambiguation helps reconcile conflicting views.
Clarification resolves apparent inconsistencies.
Abstract
This paper follows up a recent debate as to whether classical electrodynamics is inconsistent. I suggest that disagreements can be managed by disambiguating 'theory' in two different ways.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Relativity and Gravitational Theory · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
