Prediction and explanation in the multiverse
Jaume Garriga, Alexander Vilenkin

TL;DR
The paper proposes a precise way to define the reference class for probability predictions in the multiverse, suggesting that observers with identical information content form the ideal class, and discusses practical strategies for class selection.
Contribution
It introduces an unambiguous definition of the ideal reference class for multiverse predictions based on observers' information content and explores practical implications.
Findings
The ideal reference class is all observers with identical information.
Wider classes can be used by tracing over uncorrelated information.
Optimal prediction involves assuming typicality within the chosen reference class.
Abstract
Probabilities in the multiverse can be calculated by assuming that we are typical representatives in a given reference class. But is this class well defined? What should be included in the ensemble in which we are supposed to be typical? There is a widespread belief that this question is inherently vague, and that there are various possible choices for the types of reference objects which should be counted in. Here we argue that the ``ideal'' reference class (for the purpose of making predictions) can be defined unambiguously in a rather precise way, as the set of all observers with identical information content. When the observers in a given class perform an experiment, the class branches into subclasses who learn different information from the outcome of that experiment. The probabilities for the different outcomes are defined as the relative numbers of observers in each subclass. For…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
