Superfield approach to symmetry invariance in QED with complex scalar fields
R. P. Malik (Bhu), B. P. Mandal (Bhu)

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the Grassmannian independence of the super Lagrangian density on a (4, 2)-dimensional supermanifold provides a clear geometric proof of BRST and anti-BRST invariance in a 4D QED model with complex scalar fields.
Contribution
It introduces a superfield approach on a (4, 2)-dimensional supermanifold to geometrically prove BRST invariance in scalar QED.
Findings
Grassmannian independence implies BRST invariance
Superfield formalism encodes symmetry as translations along Grassmann directions
Geometric interpretation of gauge invariance in superfield language
Abstract
We show that the Grassmannian independence of the super Lagrangian density, expressed in terms of the superfields defined on a (4, 2)-dimensional supermanifold, is a clear-cut proof for the Becchi-Rouet-Stora-Tyutin (BRST) and anti-BRST invariance of the corresoponding four (3 + 1)-dimensional (4D) Lagrangian density that describes the interaction between the U(1) gauge field and the charged complex scalar fields. The above 4D field theoretical model is considered on a (4, 2)-dimensional supermanifold parametrized by the ordinary four spacetime variables x^\mu (with \mu = 0, 1, 2, 3) and a pair of Grassmannian variables \theta and \bar\theta (with \theta^2 = \bar\theta^2 = 0, \theta \bar\theta + \bar\theta \theta = 0). Geometrically, the (anti-)BRST invariance is encoded in the translation of the super Lagrangian density along the Grassmannian directions of the above supermanifold such…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
