Observable Consequences of Planet Formation Models in Systems with Close-in Terrestrial Planets
Sean N. Raymond, Rory Barnes, Avi M. Mandell

TL;DR
This paper compares various models for the formation of close-in terrestrial planets, analyzing their observable signatures to distinguish among different formation mechanisms using current and upcoming observational data.
Contribution
It evaluates the observable predictions of multiple planet formation models, including tidal effects and photo-evaporation, to identify signatures that can differentiate these mechanisms.
Findings
Tidal circularization can produce hot Earths for massive planets very close to the star.
Photo-evaporation can strip planetary envelopes, leaving behind solid cores within 0.025-0.05 AU.
Distinct system architectures and compositions can distinguish formation models observationally.
Abstract
To date, two planetary systems have been discovered with close-in, terrestrial-mass planets (< 5-10 Earth masses). Many more such discoveries are anticipated in the coming years with radial velocity and transit searches. Here we investigate the different mechanisms that could form "hot Earths" and their observable predictions. Models include: 1) in situ accretion; 2) formation at larger orbital distance followed by inward "type 1" migration; 3) formation from material being "shepherded" inward by a migrating gas giant planet; 4) formation from material being shepherded by moving secular resonances during dispersal of the protoplanetary disk; 5) tidal circularization of eccentric terrestrial planets with close-in perihelion distances; and 6) photo-evaporative mass loss of a close-in giant planet. Models 1-4 have been validated in previous work. We show that tidal circularization can form…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
