Paleontological Tests: Human-like Intelligence is not a Convergent Feature of Evolution
Charles H. Lineweaver

TL;DR
This paper challenges the idea that human-like intelligence has evolved independently multiple times, questioning its role as a convergent evolutionary feature and discussing implications for extraterrestrial intelligence searches.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis showing that human-like intelligence is not a common convergent outcome in evolution, impacting theories of intelligent life development.
Findings
Encephalization quotients do not consistently increase over time.
Human-like intelligence is not a convergent evolutionary feature.
Implications for extraterrestrial intelligence searches are discussed.
Abstract
We critically examine the evidence for the idea that encephalization quotients increase with time. We find that human-like intelligence is not a convergent feature of evolution. Implications for the search for extraterrestrial intelligence are discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFractal and DNA sequence analysis · Cognitive Science and Education Research
