
TL;DR
This paper introduces new methods for constructing minimal tree realizations of linear codes, linking code complexity to graph theory, and resolving a conjecture about the relationship between trellis complexity and treewidth.
Contribution
It provides two novel constructions for minimal tree realizations and establishes a connection between code treewidth and graph treewidth, resolving a longstanding conjecture.
Findings
Minimal tree realizations can be constructed using two new methods.
The minimal realization minimizes local constraint code dimensions.
The gap between trellis constraint complexity and treewidth can be arbitrarily large.
Abstract
A tree decomposition of the coordinates of a code is a mapping from the coordinate set to the set of vertices of a tree. A tree decomposition can be extended to a tree realization, i.e., a cycle-free realization of the code on the underlying tree, by specifying a state space at each edge of the tree, and a local constraint code at each vertex of the tree. The constraint complexity of a tree realization is the maximum dimension of any of its local constraint codes. A measure of the complexity of maximum-likelihood decoding for a code is its treewidth, which is the least constraint complexity of any of its tree realizations. It is known that among all tree realizations of a code that extends a given tree decomposition, there exists a unique minimal realization that minimizes the state space dimension at each vertex of the underlying tree. In this paper, we give two new constructions of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
