How close are the option pricing formulas of Bachelier and Black-Merton-Scholes?
Walter Schachermayer, Josef Teichmann

TL;DR
This paper compares Bachelier's and Black-Merton-Scholes's option pricing formulas, showing they align closely both theoretically and empirically, and explains why Bachelier's model provides good short-term approximations.
Contribution
It demonstrates the close agreement between the two models and explains the effectiveness of Bachelier's approach using chaos expansion methods.
Findings
Prices of both models coincide very well
Bachelier's model provides good short-time approximations
Historical data supports the theoretical comparison
Abstract
We compare the option pricing formulas of Louis Bachelier and Black-Merton-Scholes and observe -- theoretically as well as for Bachelier's original data -- that the prices coincide very well. We illustrate Louis Bachelier's efforts to obtain applicable formulas for option pricing in pre-computer time. Furthermore we explain -- by simple methods from chaos expansion -- why Bachelier's model yields good short-time approximations of prices and volatilities.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic processes and financial applications · Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis · Economic theories and models
