Clustering of galaxies at 3.6 microns in the Spitzer Wide-area Infrared Extragalactic legacy survey
I. Waddington, S. J. Oliver, T. S. R. Babbedge, F. Fang, D. Farrah, A., Franceschini, E. A. Gonzalez-Solares, C. J. Lonsdale, G. Rodighiero, M., Rowan-Robinson, D. L. Shupe, J. A. Surace, M. Vaccari, C. K. Xu

TL;DR
This study measures galaxy clustering at 3.6 microns in the SWIRE survey, revealing how clustering strength varies with redshift and flux, and comparing observations with galaxy evolution models.
Contribution
It provides new measurements of galaxy angular and spatial clustering at 3.6 microns, and evaluates the consistency of galaxy evolution models with these observations.
Findings
Clustering strength is significant at all flux limits.
Correlation length decreases from 6.1 to 2.9 h^{-1} Mpc with increasing redshift.
GalICS simulations match angular clustering but not spatial clustering.
Abstract
We investigate the clustering of galaxies selected in the 3.6 micron band of the Spitzer Wide-area Infrared Extragalactic (SWIRE) legacy survey. The angular two-point correlation function is calculated for eleven samples with flux limits of S_3.6 > 4-400 mujy, over an 8 square degree field. The angular clustering strength is measured at >5-sigma significance at all flux limits, with amplitudes of A=(0.49-29)\times10^{-3} at one degree, for a power-law model, A\theta^{-0.8}. We estimate the redshift distributions of the samples using phenomological models, simulations and photometric redshifts, and so derive the spatial correlation lengths. We compare our results with the GalICS (Galaxies In Cosmological Simulations) models of galaxy evolution and with parameterized models of clustering evolution. The GalICS simulations are consistent with our angular correlation functions, but fail to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
