Why Does the Rouse Model Works at Least Satisfactorily at Polymer Molecular Masses M<M_c ?
Nail Fatkullin

TL;DR
This paper generalizes the Rouse model without assuming Gaussian chain statistics, showing it accurately describes decay rates of polymer modes at molecular masses below a critical value, M_c.
Contribution
It introduces a generalized Rouse model derived from nonlinear Langevin equations, explaining its applicability at lower molecular masses without Gaussian assumptions.
Findings
Decay of shortwave mode autocorrelations is well described by linearized equations.
The Rouse model applies to longwave modes even without Gaussian assumptions.
Results explain differences in Kuhn and Rouse segment lengths from experiments.
Abstract
Generalization of the Rouse model without any use of the postulates concerning the Gaussian distribution of the vector connecting the ends of segments is advanced. In the initial (in general, nonlinear) Langevin equations, self-averaging over continuous fragments of a macromolecule naturally defines a linear term for the tagged chain, and this term differs from the entropy term of the classical Rouse model only by the numerical coefficient. According to the inertia-free approximation, the initial decay rates of correlation functions for the normal modes are described by the Rouse model independently of the character of fluctuations of the vector connecting the ends of the Kuhn segment. This statement is valid for any moment if the initial Langevin equations are treated in terms of the approximation of dynamic self-consistency. Simulation of the Fraenkel chains by the method of Brownian…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning in Materials Science
