Chandra X-ray Observations of the 0.6 < z < 1.1 Red-Sequence Cluster Survey Sample
Amalia K. Hicks, Erica Ellingson, Mark Bautz, Benjamin Cain, David, Gilbank, M. D. Gladders, Henk Hoekstra, Howard Yee, Gordon Garmire

TL;DR
This study uses Chandra X-ray observations to analyze 13 high-redshift galaxy clusters from the Red-sequence Cluster Survey, revealing their properties, scaling relations, and discrepancies with lower-redshift samples, suggesting complex baryonic processes.
Contribution
First detailed X-ray analysis of optically-selected clusters at 0.6<z<1.1, examining their scaling relations and baryonic content compared to lower-redshift samples.
Findings
RCS clusters are consistent with self-similar scaling expectations.
High-z RCS clusters have lower X-ray luminosity for a given temperature compared to lower-z samples.
Gas mass fractions within R(2500) are about half of expectations, indicating elevated central entropy.
Abstract
We present the results of Chandra observations of 13 optically-selected clusters with 0.6<z< 1.1, discovered via the Red-sequence Cluster Survey (RCS). All but one are detected at S/N>3; though 3 were not observed long enough to support detailed analysis. Surface brightness profiles are fit to beta-models. Integrated spectra are extracted within R(2500), and Tx and Lx information is obtained. We derive gas and total masses within R(2500) and R(500). Cosmologically corrected scaling relations are investigated, and we find the RCS clusters to be consistent with self-similar scaling expectations. However discrepancies exist between the RCS sample and lower-z X-ray selected samples for relationships involving Lx, with the higher-z RCS clusters having lower Lx for a given Tx. In addition, we find that gas mass fractions within R(2500) for the high-z RCS sample are lower than expected by a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
