Integral elements of K-theory and products of modular curves II
A. J. Scholl

TL;DR
This paper explores the concept of integrality in motivic cohomology and K-theory, establishing their equivalence in certain cases for products of curves and linking it to broader conjectures in arithmetic geometry.
Contribution
It proves the equivalence of different integrality notions in motivic cohomology/K-theory for products of curves and connects this to standard conjectures in arithmetic algebraic geometry.
Findings
Proved equivalence of integrality notions in specific cases
Reduced their equivalence to standard conjectures
Extended previous results to a general setting
Abstract
We discuss the relationship between different notions of "integrality" in motivic cohomology/K-theory which arise in the Beilinson and Bloch-Kato conjectures, and prove their equivalence in some cases for products of curves (used in the authors' previous paper in this series), as well as obtaining a general result, first proved by Jannsen (unpublished), which reduces their equivalence to standard conjectures in arithmetic algebraic geometry.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
