Cosmological Density Fluctuations in Stochastic Gravity -- Formalism and Linear Analysis --
Yuko Urakawa, Kei-ichi Maeda

TL;DR
This paper investigates primordial cosmological perturbations using stochastic gravity, comparing results with standard linear theory, and finds agreement on observable scales but discrepancies on superhorizon scales, indicating the need for extended quantization.
Contribution
It introduces a formalism for analyzing primordial perturbations in stochastic gravity and compares its predictions with gauge-invariant linear perturbation theory, highlighting the conditions for agreement and discrepancies.
Findings
Agreement with gauge-invariant theory for sub-horizon scales
Discrepancy on superhorizon scales suggests missing gravitational degrees of freedom
Highlights importance of including longitudinal gravitational modes in quantization
Abstract
We study primordial perturbations generated from quantum fluctuations of an inflaton based on the formalism of stochastic gravity. Integrating out the degree of freedom of the inflaton field, we analyze the time evolution of the correlation function of the curvature perturbation at tree level and compare it with the prediction made by the gauge-invariant linear perturbation theory. We find that our result coincides with that of the gauge-invariant perturbation theory if the e-folding from the horizon crossing time is smaller than some critical value (slow-roll parameter ), which is the case for the scales of the observed cosmological structures. However, in the limit of the superhorizon scale, we find a discrepancy in the curvature perturbation, which suggests that we should include the longitudinal part of the gravitational field in the quantization of a scalar field…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
