The transiting exoplanet host star GJ 436: a test of stellar evolution models in the lower main sequence, and revised planetary parameters
Guillermo Torres (Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics)

TL;DR
This study tests stellar evolution models for low-mass M dwarf stars using GJ 436, refining planetary parameters and highlighting model discrepancies, which are crucial for understanding exoplanet host stars in the lower main sequence.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates how to accurately infer stellar and planetary parameters for GJ 436 using models despite known radius discrepancies, providing a method applicable to similar systems.
Findings
GJ 436's stellar radius is 10% larger than standard model predictions.
Refined planetary mass and radius: 23.17 Earth masses, 4.22 Earth radii.
Stellar models can be used effectively with transit data to estimate parameters despite known limitations.
Abstract
Knowledge of the stellar parameters for the parent stars of transiting exoplanets is pre-requisite for establishing the planet properties themselves, and often relies on stellar evolution models. GJ 436, which is orbited by a transiting Neptune-mass object, presents a difficult case because it is an M dwarf. Stellar models in this mass regime are not as reliable as for higher mass stars, and tend to underestimate the radius. Here we use constraints from published transit light curve solutions for GJ 436 along with other spectroscopic quantities to show how the models can still be used to infer the mass and radius accurately, and at the same time allow the radius discrepancy to be estimated. Similar systems should be found during the upcoming Kepler mission, and could provide in this way valuable constraints to stellar evolution models in the lower main sequence. The stellar mass and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
