Kerr Black Holes are Not Unique to General Relativity
Dimitrios Psaltis (Arizona), Delphine Perrodin (Arizona), Keith R., Dienes (Arizona), Irina Mocioiu (Penn State)

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that black hole solutions in extended gravity theories are nearly identical to those in general relativity, implying that observing Kerr black holes alone cannot confirm Einstein's theory over alternatives.
Contribution
It shows that black hole solutions in extended gravity theories are indistinguishable from those in general relativity, challenging the use of Kerr metrics as definitive tests.
Findings
Black hole solutions in extended theories mimic those in GR
Observations of Kerr black holes cannot confirm Einstein's theory
Deviations from Kerr would indicate new physics
Abstract
Considerable attention has recently focused on gravity theories obtained by extending general relativity with additional scalar, vector, or tensor degrees of freedom. In this paper, we show that the black-hole solutions of these theories are essentially indistinguishable from those of general relativity. Thus, we conclude that a potential observational verification of the Kerr metric around an astrophysical black hole cannot, in and of itself, be used to distinguish between these theories. On the other hand, it remains true that detection of deviations from the Kerr metric will signify the need for a major change in our understanding of gravitational physics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
