Uniting the Quiescent Emission and Burst Spectra of Magnetar Candidates
Yujin E. Nakagawa, Atsumasa Yoshida, Kazutaka Yamaoka, Noriaki, Shibazaki

TL;DR
This study analyzes the spectra of magnetar candidates' quiescent emission and bursts, revealing a common two-blackbody model and correlations suggesting a shared emission mechanism, with some sources showing additional non-thermal components.
Contribution
It demonstrates that both quiescent and burst spectra of magnetar candidates can be modeled by a two-blackbody function, indicating a unified emission process.
Findings
Spectra are well fitted by a two-blackbody model.
A consistent temperature ratio (~0.4) between two blackbodies.
Some AXPs exhibit excess emission above 7 keV, indicating a non-thermal component.
Abstract
Spectral studies of quiescent emission and bursts of magnetar candidates using XMM-Newton, Chandra and Swift data are presented. Spectra of both the quiescent emission and the bursts for most magnetar candidates are reproduced by a photoelectrically absorbed two blackbody function (2BB). There is a strong correlation between lower and higher temperatures of 2BB (kT_LT and kT_HT) for the magnetar candidates of which the spectra are well reproduced by 2BB. In addition, a square of radius for kT_T (R_LT^2) is well correlated with a square of radius for kT_HT (R_HT^2). A ratio kT_LT/kT_HT ~ 0.4 is nearly constant irrespective of objects and/or emission types (i.e., the quiescent emission and the bursts). This would imply a common emission mechanism among the magnetar candidates. The relation between the quiescent emission and the bursts might be analogous to a relation between microflares…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
