The evolution of the peculiar Type Ia supernova SN 2005hk over 400 days
D.K. Sahu, Masaomi Tanaka, G.C. Anupama, Koji S. Kawabata, Keiichi, Maeda, Nozomu Tominaga, Ken'ichi Nomoto, Paolo A. Mazzali, T.P. Prabhu

TL;DR
This study presents detailed photometric and spectroscopic observations of the peculiar Type Ia supernova SN 2005hk over 400 days, revealing its underluminosity, low ejecta velocity, and spectral evolution, and models its explosion as a low-energy Chandrasekhar-mass thermonuclear event.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive long-term observational analysis of SN 2005hk, including spectral modeling and explosion energetics, highlighting its peculiarities compared to normal Type Ia supernovae.
Findings
SN 2005hk is underluminous and has lower ejecta velocity than normal Type Ia supernovae.
Spectra beyond 200 days lack forbidden lines, dominated by permitted lines with P-Cygni profiles.
A low-energy Chandrasekhar-mass explosion model explains the observed light curve and spectra.
Abstract
photometry and medium resolution optical spectroscopy of peculiar Type Ia supernova SN 2005hk are presented and analysed, covering the pre-maximum phase to around 400 days after explosion. The supernova is found to be underluminous compared to "normal" Type Ia supernovae. The photometric and spectroscopic evolution of SN 2005hk is remarkably similar to the peculiar Type Ia event SN 2002cx. The expansion velocity of the supernova ejecta is found to be lower than normal Type Ia events. The spectra obtained days since explosion do not show the presence of forbidden [\ion{Fe}{ii}], [\ion{Fe}{iii}] and [\ion{Co}{iii}] lines, but are dominated by narrow, permitted \ion{Fe}{ii}, NIR \ion{Ca}{ii} and \ion{Na}{i} lines with P-Cygni profiles. Thermonuclear explosion model with Chandrasekhar mass ejecta and a kinetic energy smaller () than…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
