What are the benefits of bound (protonation) states for the electron-transfer kinetics?
Dmitry V. Matyushov

TL;DR
This paper presents a model showing how local binding and protonation states influence electron transfer kinetics, predicting non-Gaussian fluctuations and a maximum in charge-transfer bandwidth with varying binding particle concentration.
Contribution
It introduces a non-Gaussian, non-parabolic free energy surface model for electron transfer affected by binding, explaining pH-dependent rate changes.
Findings
Charge-transfer bandwidth peaks with binding particle concentration.
Electron transfer rates are modulated by protonation states.
Non-Gaussian energy gap fluctuations influence kinetics.
Abstract
We describe a model of electron transfer reactions affected by local binding to the donor or acceptor sites of a particle in equilibrium with the solution. The statistics of fluctuations of the donor-acceptor energy gap caused by binding/unbinding events are non-Gaussian, and the resulting free energy surfaces of electron transfer are non-parabolic. The band-width of the charge-transfer optical transition is predicted to pass through a maximum as a function of the concentration of binding particles in the solution. The model is used to rationalize recent observations of pH-dependence of electron transfer rates involving changes in the protonation state of the donor-acceptor complex.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies · Free Radicals and Antioxidants · Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
