Constraining Cosmic Evolution of Type Ia Supernovae
Ryan J. Foley, A. V. Filippenko, C. Aguilera, A. C. Becker, S., Blondin, P. Challis, A. Clocchiatti, R. Covarrubias, T. M. Davis, P. M., Garnavich, S. Jha, R. P. Kirshner, K. Krisciunas, B. Leibundgut, W. Li, T., Matheson, A. Miceli, G. Miknaitis, G. Pignata, A. Rest

TL;DR
This study compares high-redshift and low-redshift Type Ia supernova spectra to investigate potential evolutionary effects, revealing high similarity after accounting for galaxy contamination and estimating systematic uncertainties.
Contribution
First large-scale comparison of high- and low-redshift SN Ia spectra using composite spectra, quantifying galaxy contamination and spectral variance.
Findings
High-redshift and low-redshift spectra are very similar after correction.
Galaxy light contamination is higher in high-redshift spectra.
SN evolution is constrained to be less than 10% in optical spectra.
Abstract
We present the first large-scale effort of creating composite spectra of high-redshift type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) and comparing them to low-redshift counterparts. Through the ESSENCE project, we have obtained 107 spectra of 88 high-redshift SNe Ia with excellent light-curve information. In addition, we have obtained 397 spectra of low-redshift SNe through a multiple-decade effort at Lick and Keck Observatories, and we have used 45 UV spectra obtained by HST/IUE. The low-redshift spectra act as a control sample when comparing to the ESSENCE spectra. In all instances, the ESSENCE and Lick composite spectra appear very similar. The addition of galaxy light to the Lick composite spectra allows a nearly perfect match of the overall spectral-energy distribution with the ESSENCE composite spectra, indicating that the high-redshift SNe are more contaminated with host-galaxy light than their…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
