Consequences of a Lambda_c/D enhancement effect on the non-photonic electron nuclear modification factor in central heavy ion collisions at RHIC energy
G.Martinez-Garcia, S.Gadrat, P.Crochet

TL;DR
This study investigates how an enhanced Lambda_c/D ratio affects the suppression of non-photonic electrons in heavy ion collisions, suggesting it can explain a significant part of the observed suppression at high transverse momentum.
Contribution
The paper provides a detailed simulation showing that Lambda_c/D enhancement can account for 20-25% of non-photonic electron suppression in central Au+Au collisions at RHIC.
Findings
Lambda_c/D ratio close to unity can explain 20-25% of suppression.
The effect remains significant at electron transverse momenta of 8-9 GeV/c.
Enhanced charm baryon production impacts heavy-quark energy loss interpretations.
Abstract
The RHIC experiments have measured the nuclear modification factor R_AA of non-photonic electrons in Au+Au collisions at sqrt(s) = 200 GeV. This R_AA exhibits a large suppression for pt > 2 GeV/c which is commonly attributed to heavy-quark energy loss. It is expected that the heavy-quark radiative energy loss is smaller than the light quark one because of the so-called dead-cone effect. An enhancement of the charm baryon yield with respect to the charm meson yield, as it is observed for light and strange hadrons, can explain part of the suppression. This phenomenon has been put forward in a previous work. We present in this paper a more complete study based on a detailed simulation which includes electrons from charm and bottom decay, charm and bottom quark realistic energy loss as well as a more realistic modeling of the Lambda_c/D enhancement. We show that a Lambda_c/D ratio close to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
