Ejecta and progenitor of the low-luminosity Type IIP supernova 2003Z
V.P. Utrobin (1, 2), N.N. Chugai (3), A. Pastorello (4) ((1) MPA,, Garching, (2) ITEP, Moscow, (3) Institute of Astronomy, RAS, Moscow, (4), Queen's University Belfast)

TL;DR
This study models supernova 2003Z to determine its progenitor's properties, estimating a progenitor mass of 14.4-17.4 solar masses and suggesting it was likely a yellow supergiant, providing insights into low-luminosity Type IIP supernovae origins.
Contribution
The paper presents hydrodynamic models and circumstellar interaction analysis to estimate the progenitor mass and characteristics of supernova 2003Z, clarifying its origin among low-luminosity Type IIP supernovae.
Findings
Estimated ejecta mass of 14 Msun
Progenitor likely a yellow supergiant
Proposed observational test to distinguish progenitor mass scenarios
Abstract
The origin of low-luminosity Type IIP supernovae is unclear: they have been proposed to originate either from massive (about 25 Msun) or low-mass (about 9 Msun) stars. We wish to determine parameters of the low-luminosity Type IIP supernova 2003Z, to estimate a mass-loss rate of the presupernova, and to recover a progenitor mass. We compute the hydrodynamic models of the supernova to describe the light curves and the observed expansion velocities. The wind density of the presupernova is estimated using a thin shell model for the interaction with circumstellar matter. We estimate an ejecta mass of 14 Msun, an explosion energy of 2.45x10^50 erg, a presupernova radius of 229 Rsun, and a radioactive Ni-56 amount of 0.0063 Msun. The upper limit of the wind density parameter in the presupernova vicinity is 10^13 g/cm, and the mass lost at the red/yellow supergiant stage is less than 0.6 Msun…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
