The Stationary Phase Method for a Wave Packet in a Semiconductor Layered System. The applicability of the method
H. Rodr\'iguez-Coppola, L. Diago-Cisneros, R. P\'erez-\'Alvarez

TL;DR
This paper applies the stationary phase method to analyze phase times of wave packets in layered semiconductor systems, including multiple barriers, using transfer matrix formalism to determine the method's applicability under various conditions.
Contribution
It extends the stationary phase method to complex layered semiconductor structures and derives conditions for its valid application based on phase derivatives.
Findings
Derived an expression for the transmitted wave phase depending on phase derivatives
Established criteria for the applicability of the stationary phase method in layered systems
Illustrated the approach with multiple barrier system analysis
Abstract
Using the formal analysis made by Bohm in his book, {\em "Quantum theory"}, Dover Publications Inc. New York (1979), to calculate approximately the phase time for a transmitted and the reflected wave packets through a potential barrier, we calculate the phase time for a semiconductor system formed by different mesoscopic layers. The transmitted and the reflected wave packets are analyzed and the applicability of this procedure, based on the stationary phase of a wave packet, is considered in different conditions. For the applicability of the stationary phase method an expression is obtained in the case of the transmitted wave depending only on the derivatives of the phase, up to third order. This condition indicates whether the parameters of the system allow to define the wave packet by its leading term. The case of a multiple barrier systems is shown as an illustration of the results.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
