Spider Optimization: Probing the Systematics of a Large Scale B-Mode Experiment
C. J. MacTavish, P. A. R. Ade, E. S. Battistelli, S. Benton, R., Bihary, J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, J. Brevik, S. Bryan, C. R. Contaldi, B. P., Crill, O. Dor\'e, L. Fissel, S. R. Golwala, M. Halpern, G. Hilton, W. Holmes,, V. V. Hristov, K. Irwin, W. C. Jones, C. L. Kuo

TL;DR
Spider is a balloon-borne CMB polarimeter designed to map large sky areas with high sensitivity, employing various strategies to minimize systematic effects and optimize B-mode polarization detection.
Contribution
This paper systematically analyzes instrument systematics and observing strategies to enhance B-mode sensitivity in a large-scale balloon experiment.
Findings
Both rapid spinning half-wave plate and spinning gondola strategies are viable for polarization modulation.
Systematic effects like detector noise, pointing jitter, and beam systematics significantly impact B-mode sensitivity.
Optimized observing strategies can mitigate systematics and improve primordial gravitational wave detection prospects.
Abstract
Spider is a long-duration, balloon-borne polarimeter designed to measure large scale Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) polarization with very high sensitivity and control of systematics. The instrument will map over half the sky with degree angular resolution in I, Q and U Stokes parameters, in four frequency bands from 96 to 275 GHz. Spider's ultimate goal is to detect the primordial gravity wave signal imprinted on the CMB B-mode polarization. One of the challenges in achieving this goal is the minimization of the contamination of B-modes by systematic effects. This paper explores a number of instrument systematics and observing strategies in order to optimize B-mode sensitivity. This is done by injecting realistic-amplitude, time-varying systematics in a set of simulated time-streams. Tests of the impact of detector noise characteristics, pointing jitter, payload pendulations,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
