The Hubble Constant

TL;DR

This review compares local and cosmic microwave background methods for measuring the Hubble constant, highlighting discrepancies and the importance of systematics in current determinations.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive overview of current Hubble constant measurements, analyzing discrepancies and the impact of systematics on accuracy.

Findings

Object-based methods yield H0 around 72-74 km/s/Mpc

CMB-based measurements give H0 around 67-68 km/s/Mpc

Remaining systematics limit measurement accuracy

Abstract

I review the current state of determinations of the Hubble constant, which gives the length scale of the Universe by relating the expansion velocity of objects to their distance. There are two broad categories of measurements. The first uses individual astrophysical objects which have some property that allows their intrinsic luminosity or size to be determined, or allows the determination of their distance by geometric means. The second category comprises the use of all-sky cosmic microwave background, or correlations between large samples of galaxies, to determine information about the geometry of the Universe and hence the Hubble constant, typically in a combination with other cosmological parameters. Many, but not all, object-based measurements give $H_0$ values of around 72-74km/s/Mpc , with typical errors of 2-3km/s/Mpc. This is in mild discrepancy with CMB-based measurements, in particular those from the Planck satellite, which give values of 67-68km/s/Mpc and typical errors of 1-2km/s/Mpc. The size of the remaining systematics indicate that accuracy rather than precision is the remaining problem in a good determination of the Hubble constant. Whether a discrepancy exists, and whether new physics is needed to resolve it, depends on details of the systematics of the object-based methods, and also on the assumptions about other cosmological parameters and which datasets are combined in the case of the all-sky methods.