The Time Response of Glass Resistive Plate Chambers to Heavily Ionizing Particles
A. Artamonov, A. Blondel, M. Bogomilov, C. Booth, S. Borghi, M. G., Catanesi, A. Cervera--Villanueva, P. Chimenti, U. Gastaldi, S. Giani, J. J., G\'omez--Cadenas, J. S. Graulich, G. Gr\'egoire, A. Grossheim, A. Guglielmi,, V. Ivanchenko, D. Kolev, C. Meurer, M. Mezzetto

TL;DR
This study investigates how the time response of glass resistive plate chambers (RPCs) varies with heavily ionizing particles, revealing a dependence on primary ionization that affects particle identification accuracy.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that the RPCs' time response to heavily ionizing particles depends on primary ionization, clarifying discrepancies in previous measurements and improving understanding of detector behavior.
Findings
RPC response varies with primary ionization levels.
Time-of-flight measurements are influenced by particle ionization.
Results help refine particle identification techniques.
Abstract
The HARP system of resistive plate chambers (RPCs) was designed to perform particle identification by the measurement of the difference in the time-of-flight of different particles. In previous papers an apparent discrepancy was shown between the response of the RPCs to minimum ionizing pions and heavily ionizing protons. Using the kinematics of elastic scattering off a hydrogen target a controlled beam of low momentum recoil protons was directed onto the chambers. With this method the trajectory and momentum, and hence the time-of-flight of the protons can be precisely predicted without need for a measurement of momentum of the protons. It is demonstrated that the measurement of the time-of-arrival of particles by the thin gas-gap glass RPC system of the HARP experiment depends on the primary ionization deposited by the particle in the detector.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
