Robustness of operator quantum error correction with respect to initialization errors
Ognyan Oreshkov

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that operator quantum error correction codes are more robust to initialization errors than previously thought, as imperfect initialization does not necessarily require more restrictive error-correction conditions.
Contribution
The study introduces a fidelity measure for subsystem encoding and shows that less restrictive conditions suffice for protecting against initialization errors in OQEC.
Findings
Imperfect initialization does not require stricter error correction conditions.
Fidelity between encoded states can only increase due to initialization errors.
More restrictive conditions are unnecessary for DFSs and general OQEC codes.
Abstract
In the theory of operator quantum error correction (OQEC), the notion of correctability is defined under the assumption that states are perfectly initialized inside a particular subspace, a factor of which (a subsystem) contains the protected information. If the initial state of the system does not belong entirely to the subspace in question, the restriction of the state to the otherwise correctable subsystem may not remain invariant after the application of noise and error correction. It is known that in the case of decoherence-free subspaces and subsystems (DFSs) the condition for perfect unitary evolution inside the code imposes more restrictive conditions on the noise process if one allows imperfect initialization. It was believed that these conditions are necessary if DFSs are to be able to protect imperfectly encoded states from subsequent errors. By a similar argument, general…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
