Synthesis models in the VO framework
M. Cervino (1, 4), E. Terlevich (2), R. Terlevich (2), C., Rodrigo-Blanco (3, 4), V. Luridiana (1, 4), A. Lopez, (2), E. Solano (3, and 4) ((1) IAA-CSIC, (2) INAOE, (3) LAEFF-INTA, (4) SVO)

TL;DR
This paper discusses efforts to integrate evolutionary synthesis models into the Virtual Observatory framework, highlighting tools like PGos3 and addressing challenges in standardizing model descriptions for better usage.
Contribution
It introduces the VO tool PGos3 that includes public SSP models and discusses the challenges of standardizing synthesis models within the VO framework.
Findings
Development of PGos3 tool with SSP models
Identification of problems in including synthesis models in VO
Encouragement for standardizing model descriptions
Abstract
The theory interest group in the International Virtual Observatory Alliance (IVOA) has the goal of ensuring that theoretical data and services are taken into account in the IVOA standards process. In this poster we present some of the efforts carried out by this group to include evolutionary synthesis models in the VO framework. In particular we present the VO tool PGos3, developed by the INAOE (Mexico) and the Spanish Virtual Observatory which includes most of public SSP models in the VO framework (e.g. VOSpec). We also describe the problems related with the inclusion of synthesis models in the VO framework and we try to encourage people to define the way in which synthesis models should be described. This issue has implications not only for the inclusion of synthesis models in the the VO framework but also for a proper usage of synthesis models.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
