Spitzer/IRS Observations of Seyfert 1.8s and 1.9s: A Comparison with Seyfert 1s and Seyfert 2s
R. P. Deo, D. M. Crenshaw, S. B. Kraemer, M. Dietrich, M. Elitzur, H., Teplitz, T. J. Turner

TL;DR
This study uses Spitzer mid-infrared spectra to compare Seyfert 1.8/1.9 galaxies with Seyfert 1 and 2, revealing differences in spectral features, starburst activity, and AGN strength that inform unified models.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed mid-IR spectral comparison of Seyfert 1.8/1.9s with other Seyfert types, highlighting starburst contributions and emission line differences.
Findings
Seyfert 1.8/1.9s show strong starburst features similar to Seyfert 2s.
Weak high-ionization lines suggest weaker AGN activity in Seyfert 1.8/1.9s.
Deep silicate absorption is linked to host galaxy inclination or merging activity.
Abstract
We present Spitzer Space Telescope mid-infrared spectra of 12 Seyfert 1.8 and 1.9 galaxies over the 5-38 um region. We compare the spectral characteristics of this sample to those of 58 Seyfert 1 and Seyfert 2 galaxies from the Spitzer archives. An analysis of the spectral shapes, the silicate 10 um feature and the emission line fluxes have enabled us to characterize the mid-IR properties of Seyfert 1.8/1.9s. We find that the equivalent widths of the 10 um silicate feature are generally weak in all Seyfert galaxies, as previously reported by several studies. The few Seyfert galaxies in this sample that show deep 10 um silicate absorption features are highly inclined and/or merging galaxies. It is likely that these absorption features originate primarily in the dusty interstellar medium of the host galaxy rather than in a dusty torus on parsec scales close to the central engine. We find…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
