On the origin of ultra high energy cosmic rays: Subluminal and superluminal relativistic shocks
Athina Meli (1,2), Julia K. Becker (2), John J. Quenby (3) ((1), Physics Department, National University of Athens, Greece (2) Institut fuer, Physik, Universitaet Dortmund, Germany (3) Blackett Laboratory, Imperial, College London, UK)

TL;DR
This paper systematically studies relativistic shock acceleration of ultra high energy cosmic rays, comparing superluminal and subluminal shocks, and finds subluminal shocks in AGN jets can produce observed cosmic ray fluxes up to 10^{21} eV.
Contribution
It provides the first systematic simulation comparison of superluminal and subluminal shocks at high Lorentz factors up to 1000, revealing their different efficiencies in cosmic ray acceleration.
Findings
Superluminal shocks are inefficient at energies above 10^{18.5} eV.
Subluminal shocks can accelerate particles up to 10^{21} eV.
AGN jets with mildly relativistic shocks produce E^{-2} spectra, matching observations.
Abstract
The flux of Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays (UHECRs) at eV is believed to arise in plasma shock environments in extragalactic sources. In this paper, we present a systematic study of particle acceleration by relativistic shocks, in particular concerning the dependence on bulk Lorentz factor and the angle between the magnetic field and the shockflow. For the first time, simulation results of super- and subluminal shocks with boost factors up to are investigated and compared systematically. While superluminal shocks are shown to be inefficient at the highest energies ( eV), subluminal shocks may provide particles up to eV, limited only by the Hillas-criterion. For the subluminal case, we find that mildly relativistic shocks, thought to occur in jets of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN, ) yield energy spectra of $dN/dE\sim…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
