A Direct Precision Measurement of the Intergalactic Lyman-alpha Opacity at 2<z<4.2
C.-A. Faucher-Giguere (1), J. X. Prochaska (2), A. Lidz (1), L., Hernquist (1), M. Zaldarriaga (1) ((1) Harvard University, (2) UCO/Lick, Observatory)

TL;DR
This study provides a highly precise measurement of the intergalactic Lyman-alpha opacity evolution between redshifts 2 and 4.2, revealing deviations from simple models and highlighting the importance of accounting for systematic biases and metal absorption.
Contribution
It offers the largest high-resolution dataset for this redshift range, improves error estimation, and identifies biases in previous continuum fitting methods, advancing understanding of intergalactic medium evolution.
Findings
Measured tau_eff with 3% precision at z=3
Detected significant deviations from power-law evolution near z=3.2
Quantified metal absorption contribution as 6-9% at z=3
Abstract
We directly measure the evolution of the intergalactic Lya effective optical depth, tau_eff, over the redshift range 2<z<4.2 from a sample of 86 high-resolution, high-signal-to-noise quasar spectra obtained with the ESI and HIRES spectrographs on Keck, and with the MIKE spectrograph on Magellan. This represents an improvement over previous analyses of the Lya forest from high-resolution spectra in this redshift interval of a factor of two in the size of the data set alone. We pay particular attention to robust error estimation and extensively test for systematic effects. We find that our estimates of the quasar continuum levels in the Lya forest obtained by spline fitting are systematically biased low, with the magnitude of the bias increasing with redshift, but that this bias can be accounted for using mock spectra. The mean fractional error is <1% at z=2, 4% at z=3, and 12% at z=4.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
