Manipulating atoms in an optical lattice: Fractional fermion number and its optical quantum measurement
J. Ruostekoski, J. Javanainen, G. V. Dunne

TL;DR
This paper analyzes a scheme to engineer fractional fermion numbers in a 1D optical lattice of fermionic atoms, demonstrating how topological defects induce fractionalization and how optical measurements can detect these effects.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analytical and numerical study of fractional fermion number in optical lattices with topological defects, linking atomic Hamiltonians to relativistic Dirac models and proposing optical detection methods.
Findings
Fractional fermion number arises at topological defects in engineered optical lattices.
Optical scattering can detect fractionalization through atom counting statistics.
The atomic Hamiltonian is shown to be equivalent to a relativistic Dirac Hamiltonian in the low-energy limit.
Abstract
We provide a detailed analysis of our previously proposed scheme [Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 180401, (2002)] to engineer the profile of the hopping amplitudes for atomic gases in a 1D optical lattice so that the particle number becomes fractional. We consider a constructed system of a dilute two-species gas of fermionic atoms where the two components are coupled via a coherent electromagnetic field with a topologically nontrivial phase profile. We show both analytically and numerically how the resulting atomic Hamiltonian in a prepared dimerized optical lattice with a defect in the pattern of alternating hopping amplitudes exhibits a fractional fermion number. In particular, in the low-energy limit we demonstrate the equivalence of the atomic Hamiltonian to a relativistic Dirac Hamiltonian describing fractionalization in quantum field theory. Expanding on our earlier argument [Phys. Rev.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
