Bayesian posterior classification of planetary nebulae according to the Peimbert types
C. Quireza (1), H.J. Rocha-Pinto (2), W.J. Maciel (3) ((1), Observatorio Nacional/MCT, (2) Observatorio do Valongo/UFRJ, (3) Instituto de, Astronomia, Geofisica e Ciencias Atmosfericas/USP)

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian method to classify planetary nebulae into Peimbert types, providing probabilistic, data-driven classifications that improve upon traditional, often ambiguous methods.
Contribution
It develops a Bayesian posterior probability approach for planetary nebulae classification, allowing for more accurate and quantitative group assignments based on observational data.
Findings
Bayesian method improves classification accuracy.
Probabilistic classification handles ambiguous cases.
Method extends to objects with limited data.
Abstract
In this paper we present a re-analysis of the criteria used to characterize the Peimbert classes I, IIa, IIb, III and IV, through a statistical study of a large sample of planetary nebulae previously classified according to these groups. In the original classification, it is usual to find planetary nebulae that cannot be associated with a single type; these most likely have dubious classifications into two or three types. Statistical methods can greatly contribute in providing a better characterization of planetary nebulae groups. We use the Bayes Theorem to calculate the posterior probabilities for an object to be member of each of the types I, IIa, IIb, III and IV. This calculation is particularly important for planetary nebulae that are ambiguously classified in the traditional method. The posterior probabilities are defined from the probability density function of classificatory…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
