Exactly-solvable coupled-channel potential models of atom-atom magnetic Feshbach resonances from supersymmetric quantum mechanics
Andrey M. Pupasov, Boris F. Samsonov, Jean-Marc Sparenberg

TL;DR
This paper develops exactly-solvable coupled-channel potential models for atom-atom Feshbach resonances using supersymmetric quantum mechanics, providing analytical forms and inverse problem solutions relevant for cold atom physics.
Contribution
It introduces a new class of exactly-solvable coupled-channel potentials derived via supersymmetric transformations, with explicit parameterization and applications to Feshbach resonances.
Findings
Potential models depend on a finite set of parameters including bound states and resonances.
The models can reproduce large background scattering lengths near Feshbach resonances.
Explicit inverse solutions relate potential parameters to physical scattering properties.
Abstract
Starting from a system of radial Schr\"odinger equations with a vanishing potential and finite threshold differences between the channels, a coupled exactly-solvable potential model is obtained with the help of a single non-conservative supersymmetric transformation. The obtained potential matrix, which subsumes a result obtained in the literature, has a compact analytical form, as well as its Jost matrix. It depends on unconstrained parameters and on one upper-bounded parameter, the factorization energy. A detailed study of the model is done for the case: a geometrical analysis of the zeros of the Jost-matrix determinant shows that the model has 0, 1 or 2 bound states, and 0 or 1 resonance; the potential parameters are explicitly expressed in terms of its bound-state energies, of its resonance energy and width, or of the open-channel scattering…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
