Confining vacua and Q-state Potts models with Q<1
F. Gliozzi

TL;DR
This paper investigates the relationship between magnetic monopole condensation and center vortex percolation in 3D gauge models related to Q-state Potts models with Q<1, revealing vacua where monopoles do not lead to confinement.
Contribution
It introduces a class of dual 3D gauge models with Q<1, demonstrating that monopole condensation alone does not guarantee confinement, unlike in typical Yang-Mills models.
Findings
Monopole condensation does not always imply confinement.
Existence of vacua with dilute vortex gas and perimeter law Wilson loops.
At stronger coupling, both monopoles and vortices coexist in confining vacua.
Abstract
In most Yang-Mills models the vacuum where magnetic monopoles condense coincides with that where center vortices percolate, thus it is not clear which of these two properties is most directly involved in producing confinement. It is pointed out that there is a class of 3D gauge models, which can be though of as duals of Q-state Potts models with Q < 1, where the magnetic monopole condensation is a necessary but not sufficient condition for percolation of center vortices. A set of numerical tests at Q=1/10 shows that there is a vacuum in which the magnetic monopole condensate does not yield confinement, in the sense that large Wilson loops obey a perimeter law. In such a vacuum the center vortices form a dilute gas of loops. At stronger coupling there is also a truly confining vacuum where both confining mechanisms are present.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural Networks and Applications
