Some doubts on the validity of the foreground Galactic contribution subtraction from microwave anisotropies
M. Lopez-Corredoira

TL;DR
This paper critically examines existing methods for removing Galactic dust contamination from CMB anisotropy data, concluding that current techniques are inadequate and that most of the observed anisotropies are not of Galactic origin.
Contribution
It provides a critical review of foreground subtraction methods and analyzes WMAP data to constrain the Galactic contribution to CMB anisotropies.
Findings
All subtraction methods are inaccurate.
Galactic contribution is less than ~10% at 1 degree scale.
Most CMB anisotropies are not Galactic in origin.
Abstract
The Galactic foreground contamination in CMBR anisotropies, especially from the dust component, is not easily separable from the cosmological or extragalactic component. In this paper, some doubts will be raised concerning the validity of the methods used to date to remove Galactic dust emission in order to show that none of them achieves its goal. First, I review the recent bibliography on the topic and discuss critically the methods of foreground subtraction: the cross-correlation with templates, analysis assuming the spectral shape of the Galactic components, the "maximum entropy method", "internal linear combination", and "wavelet-based high resolution fitting of internal templates". Second, I analyse the galactic latitude dependence from WMAP data. The frequency dependence is discussed with the data in the available literature. The result is that all methods of subtracting the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
