Congestion, equilibrium and learning: The minority game
Willemien Kets, Mark Voorneveld

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the minority game, a congestion game where players aim to choose the less popular option, characterizing Nash equilibria and examining how various learning processes predict different outcomes.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive characterization of Nash equilibria and compares predictions of different learning processes in the minority game with any odd number of players.
Findings
Different learning processes yield significantly different predictions.
The set of Nash equilibria is explicitly characterized.
Behavioral predictions vary notably across learning models.
Abstract
The minority game is a simple congestion game in which the players' main goal is to choose among two options the one that is adopted by the smallest number of players. We characterize the set of Nash equilibria and the limiting behavior of several well-known learning processes in the minority game with an arbitrary odd number of players. Interestingly, different learning processes provide considerably different predictions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Applications · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Economic theories and models
