Polarizability of molecular chains: does one need exact exchange?
C. D. Pemmaraju, S. Sanvito, and K. Burke

TL;DR
This paper investigates the accuracy of different computational methods in predicting the static polarizability of long-chain polymers, highlighting the effectiveness of simple self-interaction corrected approximations as a cost-efficient alternative to exact exchange.
Contribution
It demonstrates that simple self-interaction corrected approximations outperform standard density functional methods and are comparable or better than exact exchange in predicting polarizability.
Findings
Standard density functionals overestimate polarizability
Exact exchange aligns well with Hartree-Fock results
Self-interaction corrected methods are computationally efficient and accurate
Abstract
Standard density functional approximations greatly over-estimate the static polarizability of longchain polymers, but Hartree-Fock or exact exchange calculations do not. Simple self-interaction corrected (SIC) approximations can be even better than exact exchange, while their computational cost can scale only linearly with the number of occupied orbitals.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning in Materials Science · Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
