Photometric Calibration of the Swift Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope
T. S. Poole, A. A. Breeveld, M. J. Page, W. Landsman, S. T. Holland,, P. Roming, N. P. M. Kuin, P. J. Brown, C. Gronwall, S. Hunsberger, S. Koch,, K. O. Mason, P. Schady, D. Vanden Berk, A. J. Blustin, P. Boyd, P. Broos, M., Carter, M. M. Chester, A. Cucchiara, B. Hancock

TL;DR
This paper details the comprehensive photometric calibration of the Swift UVOT, including effective area, zero points, and response, ensuring accurate UV/optical measurements for diverse star types.
Contribution
It provides an updated, detailed calibration framework for the Swift UVOT, improving accuracy over previous calibrations and covering a wide spectral range.
Findings
Photometric zero points accurate to better than 4%
Calibration covers 1600-8000 Å spectral range
Guidelines for handling coincidence loss in data analysis
Abstract
We present the photometric calibration of the Swift UltraViolet/Optical Telescope (UVOT) which includes: optimum photometric and background apertures, effective area curves, colour transformations, conversion factors for count rates to flux, and the photometric zero points (which are accurate to better than 4 per cent) for each of the seven UVOT broadband filters. The calibration was performed with observations of standard stars and standard star fields that represent a wide range of spectral star types. The calibration results include the position dependent uniformity, and instrument response over the 1600-8000A operational range. Because the UVOT is a photon counting instrument, we also discuss the effect of coincidence loss on the calibration results. We provide practical guidelines for using the calibration in UVOT data analysis. The results presented here supersede previous…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
