Axisymmetric orbit models of N-body merger remnants: a dependency of reconstructed mass on viewing angle
J. Thomas (1,2), R. Jesseit (1), T. Naab (1), R. P. Saglia (2), A., Burkert (1), R. Bender (1,2) ((1) USM Munich, (2) MPE Garching)

TL;DR
This study investigates how assuming axial symmetry in orbit models affects the accuracy of mass and stellar motion reconstructions in N-body merger remnants with various shapes and orientations.
Contribution
It demonstrates the dependency of mass recovery accuracy on viewing angle and intrinsic shape, highlighting potential biases in modeling non-axisymmetric systems.
Findings
Mass estimates vary with viewing angle, with up to 50% underestimation for face-on, flattened systems.
Luminous M/L ratios are consistently underestimated, sometimes by a factor of 2.5.
Reconstructed velocity anisotropies depend on orbital composition and viewing angle.
Abstract
We model mock observations of collisionless N-body disc-disc mergers with an axisymmetric orbit superposition program that has been used to model Coma ellipticals. The remnants sample representatively the shapes of disc-disc mergers including prolate, triaxial and oblate objects. The aim is to better understand how the assumption of axial symmetry affects reconstructed masses and stellar motions of systems which are intrinsically not axisymmetric, whether it leads to a bias and how such a potential bias can be recognised in models of real galaxies. The mass recovery at the half-light radius depends on viewing-angle and intrinsic shape: edge-on views allow to reconstruct total masses with an accuracy between 20% (triaxial/prolate remnants) and 3% (oblate remnant). Masses of highly flattened, face-on systems are underestimated by up to 50%. Deviations in local mass densities can be larger…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
