The empirical metallicity dependence of the mass-loss rate of O- and early B-type stars
M. R. Mokiem, A. de Koter, J. S. Vink, J. Puls, C. J. Evans, S. J., Smartt, P. A. Crowther, A. Herrero, N. Langer, D. J. Lennon, F. Najarro, M., R. Villamariz

TL;DR
This study investigates how metallicity influences the mass-loss rates of hot massive stars, finding a power-law dependence that generally aligns with theoretical predictions but reveals discrepancies at lower luminosities.
Contribution
It provides empirical measurements of the metallicity dependence of stellar wind mass-loss rates, confirming theoretical models for high-luminosity stars and highlighting unexplained deviations at lower luminosities.
Findings
Mass-loss rate scales with metallicity as Mdot ∝ Z^{0.83±0.16}.
High-luminosity stars show higher mass-loss rates than predicted, suggesting wind clumping factors of ~4.
Low-luminosity stars exhibit a steeper WLR than theory predicts, with UV rates much lower than expected.
Abstract
[Abridged] We present a comprehensive study of the metallicity dependence of the mass-loss rates in stationary stellar winds of hot massive stars. Assuming a power-law dependence of mass loss on metallicity, Mdot \propto Z^{m}, and adopting a theoretical relation between the terminal velocity and metallicity, v_inf \propto Z^{0.13} (Leitherer et al.), we find m = 0.83 +/- 0.16 for non-clumped outflows from an analysis of the wind momentum luminosity relation (WLR) for stars more luminous than 10^{5.2} Lsun. Within the errors, this result agrees with the prediction of m = 0.69 +/- 0.10 from Vink et al. For the high luminosity stars we find the mass loss rates to be greater than the predictions, implying wind clumping factors in their line-forming regions of ~4. For lower luminosity stars, the winds are so weak that their strengths cannot be reliably derived from optical lines, and one…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
