A sub-horizon framework for probing the relationship between the cosmological matter distribution and metric perturbations
Mustafa A. Amin, Robert V. Wagoner, Roger D. Blandford

TL;DR
This paper introduces a sub-horizon framework to test the relationship between matter distribution and metric perturbations, enabling scale-dependent gravity tests and distinguishing between different cosmological models.
Contribution
It develops a general perturbative framework with coefficient functions to compare gravity theories on subhorizon scales, including novel signatures for braneworld models.
Findings
Calculated coefficient functions for various gravity models
Identified a potential unique signature of braneworld models
Provided a method for scale-dependent gravity testing
Abstract
The relationship between the metric and nonrelativistic matter distribution depends on the theory of gravity and additional fields, providing a possible way of distinguishing competing theories. With the assumption that the geometry and kinematics of the homogeneous universe have been measured to sufficient accuracy, we present a procedure for understanding and testing the relationship between the cosmological matter distribution and metric perturbations (along with their respective evolution) using the ratio of the physical size of the perturbation to the size of the horizon as our small expansion parameter. We expand around Newtonian gravity on linear, subhorizon scales with coefficient functions in front of the expansion parameter. Our framework relies on an ansatz which ensures that (i) the Poisson equation is recovered on small scales (ii) the metric variables (and any additional…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
