
TL;DR
This paper validates the improved accuracy and reduced error correlations of the new Hipparcos astrometric catalogue, confirming its enhanced precision over the previous version and its suitability for stellar and galactic studies.
Contribution
The paper provides a thorough validation of the new Hipparcos reduction, confirming improved accuracy and error characteristics compared to the original catalogue.
Findings
Formal errors on parallaxes are confirmed.
Error correlations are significantly reduced, explaining the improvement.
The new catalogue has 2.2 times more weight than the 1997 version.
Abstract
Context.A new reduction of the astrometric data as produced by the Hipparcos mission has been published, claiming accuracies for nearly all stars brighter than magnitude Hp = 8 to be better, by up to a factor 4, than in the original catalogue. Aims.The new Hipparcos astrometric catalogue is checked for the quality of the data and the consistency of the formal errors as well as the possible presence of error correlations. The differences with the earlier publication are explained. Methods. The internal errors are followed through the reduction process, and the external errors are investigated on the basis of a comparison with radio observations of a small selection of stars, and the distribution of negative parallaxes. Error correlation levels are investigated and the reduction by more than a factor 10 as obtained in the new catalogue is explained. Results.The formal errors on the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
