Checking the reliability of equivalent width R23 for estimating metallicities of galaxies
Y. C. Liang (1,2), F. Hammer (2), S. Y. Yin (1,3,4) ((1) NAOC,, China; (2) GEPI, Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, France; (3) Department of, Physics, Hebei Normal University, China; (4) Department of Physics, Harbin, University, China)

TL;DR
This study assesses the reliability of using equivalent width R23 instead of flux R23 for galaxy metallicity estimates, identifies biases, and proposes a correction method to improve accuracy.
Contribution
It introduces a correction based on (g-r) color to enhance the EW-R23 method's reliability for estimating galaxy metallicities.
Findings
EW-R23 introduces biases affecting log(O/H) by -0.2 to 0.1 dex.
Correction using polynomial fits reduces discrepancies to ~0.1 dex.
Over 92% of galaxies achieve accurate metallicity estimates after correction.
Abstract
We verify whether the O/H abundances of galaxies can be derived from the equivalent width (EW) R23 instead of the extinction-corrected flux R23, and eventually propose a method of improving the reliability of this empirical method, which is often used for the non-flux calibrated spectra of galaxies. We select 37,173 star-forming galaxies from the SDSS-DR2, which offers a wide range of properties to test the EW method. The EW-R23 method brings with it a significant bias: for the bulk of SDSS galaxies, it may affect the determination of log(O/H) by factors ranging from -0.2 to 0.1 dex and for some galaxies by factors ranging from -0.5 to 0.2 dex. We characterize this discrepancy (or bias) by alpha = (I_[OII]/I_Hbeta)/(EW_[OII]/EW_Hbeta), which is virtually independent of dust extinction, while tightly correlating with Dn(4000), although at a lower significance, with (g-r) colors. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
