On the Use of Blanketed Atmospheres as Boundary Conditions for Stellar Evolutionary Models
Don A. VandenBerg, Bengt Edvardsson, Kjell Eriksson, and Bengt, Gustafsson

TL;DR
This study evaluates the impact of using MARCS model atmospheres as boundary conditions in stellar evolution models, comparing different fitting points, boundary relations, and metallicities to improve accuracy and consistency.
Contribution
It introduces a method for integrating MARCS atmospheres into stellar models and compares their effects with classical boundary relations across various metallicities.
Findings
MARCS atmospheres produce nearly identical evolutionary tracks regardless of fitting point.
Boundary conditions from MARCS atmospheres predict cooler giant branches at solar metallicity.
Using MARCS atmospheres aligns models more closely with observed giant star temperatures.
Abstract
Stellar models have been computed for stars having [Fe/H] = 0.0 and -2.0 to determine the effects of using boundary conditions derived from the latest MARCS model atmospheres. The latter were fitted to the interior models at both the photosphere and at tau = 100, and at least for the 0.8-1.0 solar mass stars considered here, the resultant evolutionary tracks were found to be nearly independent of the chosen fitting point. Particular care was taken to treat the entire star as consistently as possible; i.e., both the interior and atmosphere codes assumed the same abundances and the same treatment of convection. Tracks were also computed using either the classical gray T(tau,T_eff) relation or that derived by Krishna Swamy (1966) to derive the boundary pressure. The latter predict warmer giant branches (by ~150 K) at solar abundances than those based on gray or MARCS atmospheres, which…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
