Relativity without tears

TL;DR

This paper advocates for a logical approach to teaching special relativity, emphasizing its naturalness and practical validity over historical presentation and addressing its paradoxes and correctness.

Contribution

It proposes a shift from historical to logical teaching of relativity and reinterprets its principles as the most natural description of space-time.

Findings

Relativity is best understood as a natural, practical description of space-time.

The paradoxes and correctness of relativity are reconsidered from a logical perspective.

Addresses the cosmological constant problem as a profound mystery in modern physics.

Abstract

Special relativity is no longer a new revolutionary theory but a firmly established cornerstone of modern physics. The teaching of special relativity, however, still follows its presentation as it unfolded historically, trying to convince the audience of this teaching that Newtonian physics is natural but incorrect and special relativity is its paradoxical but correct amendment. I argue in this article in favor of logical instead of historical trend in teaching of relativity and that special relativity is neither paradoxical nor correct (in the absolute sense of the nineteenth century) but the most natural and expected description of the real space-time around us valid for all practical purposes. This last circumstance constitutes a profound mystery of modern physics better known as the cosmological constant problem.