Expert Elicitation for Reliable System Design
Tim Bedford, John Quigley, Lesley Walls

TL;DR
This paper discusses how expert judgement can be effectively integrated into the reliability assessment process in systems engineering design, emphasizing the importance of problem structuring and bias mitigation.
Contribution
It introduces a holistic framework for incorporating expert judgement into reliability assessments throughout the system design lifecycle.
Findings
Expert judgement is crucial for problem structuring and failure mitigation.
Reliability assessments in design resemble a statistical control process.
Bias mitigation methods are necessary for rational consensus.
Abstract
This paper reviews the role of expert judgement to support reliability assessments within the systems engineering design process. Generic design processes are described to give the context and a discussion is given about the nature of the reliability assessments required in the different systems engineering phases. It is argued that, as far as meeting reliability requirements is concerned, the whole design process is more akin to a statistical control process than to a straightforward statistical problem of assessing an unknown distribution. This leads to features of the expert judgement problem in the design context which are substantially different from those seen, for example, in risk assessment. In particular, the role of experts in problem structuring and in developing failure mitigation options is much more prominent, and there is a need to take into account the reliability…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
